Who is responsible
Define the roles that perform, review, and receive the work. Make ownership at each handoff clear.
Workflow Mapping and Process Design
Clarify who owns each step, what they need, and how work moves between your people and systems.
Genwise helps accounting firms understand their current processes, resolve unclear handoffs, and design workflows their teams can follow. We connect the process to the software and operating instructions used to deliver the work.
Already know which workflow needs attention? Start with a focused mapping or implementation project. A full Efficiency Assessment is not required for every engagement.
Your team may know its individual responsibilities while still struggling with what happens between them.
Work can stall because:
We help bring those issues into view and agree what should change.
A useful process design connects three things:
Define the roles that perform, review, and receive the work. Make ownership at each handoff clear.
Establish the steps, inputs, decisions, readiness checks, and exception paths that keep the process understandable.
Identify the systems and records involved. Account for what happens within each tool and between them.
The resulting map provides an overview. Supporting procedures, templates, and instructions provide the detail needed to carry out the work.
Depending on your firm’s priorities and the agreed scope, workflow mapping may cover:
We can examine an existing process, design a proposed workflow, or reconcile a map with the software setup your team already uses.
Consider the transition from client onboarding to service delivery.
“Onboarding complete” may mean different things to different people. A defined handoff makes the expectations explicit.
This is an illustrative example. The exact requirements depend on your firm and engagement.
Genwise helps define those conditions and, where included, configure and test the supporting workflow.
We review available documentation, relevant system setup, and the perspectives of the people doing the work.
We distinguish the intended process from everyday practice and identify useful work that should be preserved.
We examine unclear ownership, repeated entry, unnecessary steps, and handoffs that depend on informal knowledge.
Questions requiring your team’s input remain visible until they are resolved.
We define the agreed roles, steps, inputs, review points, and exceptions.
Some changes may involve clearer instructions. Others may require configuration, training, or a connection between systems.
Your team walks through representative scenarios, including situations where work cannot proceed normally.
We refine the proposed process and supporting guidance before treating it as ready for implementation.
Where implementation is included, we translate the approved design into selected templates, settings, documentation, or automations.
We test the agreed scenarios, document remaining limitations, and confirm ownership before broader rollout.
Depending on the selected scope, deliverables may include:
We agree which deliverables are needed before work begins.
Workflow design provides a foundation for task templates, assignments, statuses, questionnaires, document requests, review steps, and reporting views.
It also helps identify where automation is appropriate and where a person should remain responsible for a decision.
Genwise works across the firm’s software stack so changes in one system account for the work happening elsewhere.
Mapping, configuration, testing, and rollout are distinct deliverables. We make their scope and status clear.
You know which workflow needs attention.
We review the available evidence, confirm the discovery required, and agree a focused scope. If the process is already clear, the work may move directly into implementation.
You do not need to purchase a full Efficiency Assessment first.
You need help deciding what to address first.
An assessment provides a broader view of operating challenges and priorities before selecting individual workflows or systems to improve.
You need implementation followed by continued adoption and optimization support.
Mapping and process design can form part of the agreed partnership priorities. Continued support applies to the implemented solutions within the engagement’s defined scope.
A workflow needs an owner and an agreed place in your operating documentation.
We help clarify who maintains the accepted process and when changes to roles, services, software, or review requirements should prompt another review.
Ongoing updates, training, and optimization follow the scope and duration of your engagement. A focused mapping project does not automatically include indefinite maintenance or support.
Yes. We review what you already have, preserve useful work, and identify where it needs clarification or updating.
No. A workflow can span several systems and include steps outside software. We consider the people, responsibilities, and tools involved in the selected process.
Not necessarily. Clearer ownership, better configuration, simpler steps, or improved guidance may address the problem. A software change is not assumed.
Only where it is included in the agreed scope. Mapping, configuration, testing, training, and rollout can be combined in an engagement, but they remain distinct deliverables.
The people who perform, review, and receive the work should help validate the process. We agree the participants and review approach for the selected workflow.
Yes. A focused workflow or handoff can be a practical starting point.
Yes. Our swimlane resource explains the approach and links to Miro’s general template.
Tell us where work gets stuck, which people and systems are involved, and what you want to improve.
We’ll discuss whether the right next step is focused workflow mapping, direct implementation, or a broader assessment.
An introductory conversation does not commit you to an assessment, project, or Annual Partnership.
We use cookies to analyze traffic and measure marketing, including advertising tracking. Details